The 221B Daily

A new edition from Baker Street every morning.

Wednesday, 29 April 2026 | Difficulty III

The Mystery of the Singapore Box

A teakwood box reaches London with every seal intact. Four hundred pounds in sapphires gone — the camphor packing still fresh.

Holmes in the opium den
“Holmes in the opium den”

Sidney Paget · The Strand Magazine, December 1891 · Public Domain

Narrated by Dr Watson — the case as it stood before us

Section I

The Scene

Setting
The firm of Carstairs, Drewett & Co, Mincing Lane, City of London — and the bonded shed of the West India Docks
Time
Wednesday afternoon, late January 1895
Weather
A raw, foggy day, the river yellow and slow under a low sky
Atmosphere
The peculiar smell of bonded cargo — camphor, tea-chests, hessian, river-mud — overlaid on a respectable City counting-house.

Section II

The Suspects

  • Mr Edmund Drewett

    Junior partner of the firm, in London

    A neat, precise man of thirty-five, the firm's expert in stones and the only partner present at the dock when the box was landed. He had supervised its passage to the bonded shed and had himself applied the dock's seals.

  • Mr Edward Jardine

    The firm's agent in Singapore — present in London on leave

    An older man, forty-eight, lean and burnt brown by the East. He had returned to England by the same steamer that carried the box and had, by the firm's standing arrangement, taken his quarters in the company's warehouse-rooms upon arrival. He had access to the bonded shed in his official capacity.

  • Mr Thomas Brace

    Senior clerk, twenty-one years in the firm

    A grey-haired, careful gentleman of fifty, who had been present when the box was opened on the Tuesday. He had, two months earlier, lost a sum at cards and had been advanced a half-year's salary by Carstairs against the debt; the matter was known throughout the firm.

  • Mr Reuben Pollack

    Lapidary, of Hatton Garden, with whom the firm had been in correspondence regarding the sale of the sapphires

    A man of some sixty years, grey-bearded, of long-established reputation. He had been the obvious purchaser for the stones on their arrival. He had not been at the dock nor at the firm's warehouse, but had received a wire from Drewett on the Saturday confirming the consignment's arrival.

  • Mr Samuel Hood

    Dock-watchman of the bonded shed

    A retired marine, fifty-eight, employed by the West India Dock Company. He had been at his post from six o'clock on the Saturday evening through to six o'clock on the Sunday morning. His logbook recorded no admission to the shed save the official check made by the dock's tide-surveyor at four o'clock on the Sunday morning, an entry initialled in his own hand.

Section III

The Evidence

  1. The freshness of the camphor leaves

    The packing of camphor leaves within the teakwood box was, as Carstairs had observed, fresh — green at the leaf-edges, the oil still strong on the cutting. Yet the box had been packed in Singapore eleven weeks earlier. Camphor leaves, as Holmes remarked, dry and yellow within three weeks of cutting, even in their own native climate.

  2. The dock's seals

    The lead seals applied by the dock company were intact. The steamer's seals beneath were also intact. The seals are, in each case, individually numbered and the numbers were correctly entered in both the dock's and the firm's manifests.

  3. Brace's debt of honour

    The senior clerk had, the previous November, lost two hundred guineas at his club and had been advanced half a year's salary by Carstairs to clear the debt. The matter was known and was, by all accounts, in the way of being repaid out of his weekly stipend.

  4. The wire to Pollack

    Drewett had wired Pollack on the Saturday afternoon to arrange a viewing of the sapphires for the Wednesday following. Pollack had wired back his agreement. The two wires were lodged in the firm's day-book.

  5. Jardine's quarters in the warehouse-rooms

    Jardine had, by the firm's standing arrangement for its returning agents, taken up residence in the small set of rooms above the bonded shed at the West India Docks on his arrival on the Saturday. The rooms communicated with the shed below by a single, locked, internal stair.

  6. The tide-surveyor's entry

    The dock's tide-surveyor, a Mr Whittock, had visited the bonded shed at four o'clock on the Sunday morning to check a consignment unrelated to the firm's. He had been admitted by Hood and had left within ten minutes. The visit was logged.

  7. The composition of the substituted parcels

    The four parcels of green river-pebbles found in place of the sapphires were, on Holmes's quiet examination, of a kind common to the upper Thames valley above Henley — quite unlike anything to be found in the East Indies.

Section IV

Statements & Testimony

  • Mr Henry Carstairs Reliable

    Senior partner, the client

    “"The seals were intact. The manifest was correct. My clerks I would answer for. I had supposed at first that the substitution must have been done in Singapore by some agent of Jardine's; but Jardine himself selected the stones and packed the box."”

  • Mr Samuel Hood Reliable

    Dock-watchman

    “"No man entered the shed on the Saturday night save the surveyor at four. I did my rounds every half-hour. The shed was secure when I left at six on the Sunday. I would stake my pension on it, sir."”

  • Mr Edmund Drewett Reliable

    Junior partner

    “"I sealed the box myself with the dock's lead seals at half past four on the Saturday afternoon. I was the last man to handle it before Mr Carstairs broke the seals on the Tuesday."”

  • Mr Edward Jardine Partial

    The firm's agent in Singapore

    “"I packed the stones at the firm's office in Singapore on the morning of the seventh. I sealed the box and signed the manifest. From that hour until Mr Carstairs broke the seals it has been in the company's custody, not in mine."”

Section V

Your Verdict

1. Name the culprit
2. Choose the method

Which of these accounts of the deed best matches the evidence?

3. Pick the keystone clue

Of all the evidence above, which single piece nails the case?

Choose a culprit, a method, and a keystone clue to render your verdict.